The
constructivist theory takes a key role in integrating technology. As stated, by
Berryman (1994) “one aspect of constructivism is the social collaboration that
takes place. Collaboration is a key in applying constructivist principles,
whether the collaboration take place between teacher and student, or student to
student.” As a teacher we, provide the scaffolding and support for students to
acquire the appropriate skill. Collaboration is also not limited to one
physical classroom. With the World Wide Web, collaboration can occur online,
where students view peers as resources for support as well.
In
any classroom, each student brings different skills, including computer-based
skills, and unique learning styles to the learning process. Each individual can
support the unique thinking and learning skills of another. For example, multimedia has the ability to
cater to individual preferences and support what can be described as
constructivist pedagogy. Constructivists believe that knowledge is constructed
socially using language; everyone has different social experiences resulting in
multiple realities. This is important when maintaining a constructivist
classroom while integrating technology while educators need to understand that
learners will require a variety of different experiences.
Instructional
technology was meant for two uses in schools: learning about computers and
using them to create basic skills. As this was being developed in schools, it
turned more into computer literacy, where students learned many different
things about the computer, including: terminology, programming, ethical and
social uses of computing and much more. In order to implement this technology,
the teachers and aides had to be trained in the technology first, in order for
their students to learn. (Berryman, 1994)
The
constructivist theory states that students are given tools to construct their
own knowledge. Applying the constructivist theory with technology integration
can allow students to work to their fullest potential. Constructivist learning
wants the educators to adopt the idea that each learner will construct, obtain,
and interpret their own knowledge differently. This active process and allows
the students to make sense of their world. When it comes to integrating technology
into classrooms, constructivism has not always been the root theory.
Previously, the philosophy of technology instruction followed the idea of
Instructivism. Instructivists argued that using an instructional system design
model could be useful to identify what is to be taught, determine how it will
be taught, and evaluate the instruction to determine if it is effective.
Although this could be effective as far as evaluation, the constructivist point
of view has also developed and is now considered when integrating technology
instruction. (Berryman, 1994)
When
maintaining a constructivist classroom while integrating technology, educators
need to understand that learners will require a variety of different
experiences. This is why a constructivist may consider these three questions
when it comes to any type of instruction: First, What does it mean to know
something? Second, how do we come to know it? And third, how does this
knowledge influence our thinking processes? The constructivists argue that the systematic
process offered by instructionalists is a problem because there is nothing
systematic about how we learn or construct knowledge. Also, activities need to
be incorporated so that learners experience real world relevance while using
technology. One benefit of using technology for instruction in today’s world is
that communication technology has allowed for constructivists principles to
still be maintained; constructivists see technology as a powerful learning
tool. As educators hold strong to their learning theory beliefs and design
their classroom around those theories, it is important to note that technology
is not an instructional choice anymore, but a necessity in today’s classrooms. (Berryman,
1994)
Berryman, S. (1994).
Cognitive science: Challenging schools to design effective learning
environments. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Institute on
Education and the Economy.